Student Solution

-->

"Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world”
– Nelson Mandela

1 University

1 Course

1 Subject

Forum 5 (Modules 5 and 6) - Part 2

Forum 5 (Modules 5 and 6) - Part 2

Q DISCUSSION BOARD FORUM 5 INSTRUCTIONS Hofstede Analysis Using the Hofstede national management dimensions of culture, you will conduct and discuss a comparative analysis of 3 foreign nations and the USA. The Discussion Board Forum assignment consists of 3 parts. Part 1 - Reservation Your instructor will provide a list of nations for this Discussion Board Forum. After reviewing the provided list of nations, select the 3 foreign nations you wish to compare national management dimensions with the USA and post a thread reserving the nations you select. Be sure to check the Discussion Board area prior to posting your reservation to ensure no one else has reserved those 3 nations. In the event any of the nations you wish to explore is already reserved by someone else, simply move on to another nation on the list. Duplicate postings will not earn credit under any circumstance (this includes posting work submitted in a previous course). Do not ask the instructor to accept a duplicate posting as this is not fair to those who followed these explicit directions. Be sure to include the names of the 3 nations you selected in your Discussion Board Forum subject line. Submit your selected 3 nations by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Monday of Module/Week 5. Part 2 - Thread After you have successfully reserved the 3 nations that interest you the most, compare the dimensions of national management cultures with the Hofstede dimensions of management cultures identified in the USA. Your thread must be placed in the Discussion Board text box and adhere precisely to the following headings and format: • SECTION I: Dimensions of Management Culture Comparison Chart (refer to https://geerthofstede.com/culture-geert-hofstede-gert-jan-hofstede/6d-model-of-national-culture). Dimension Nation 1 Nation 2 Nation 3 USA PDI IDV MAS UAI LTO • SECTION 2: Analysis of Section I Results (500 words) In your own words, provide and answer to each of the following questions: 1. How do the dimensions of management culture of the 3 foreign nations differ from each other? 2. How do the dimensions of management culture of the 3 foreign nations differ from the USA? 3. How are the dimensions of management culture of the 3 foreign nations similar to each other? 4. How are the dimensions of management culture of the 3 foreign nations similar to the USA? Submit Discussion Board Forum 5 – Thread by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Thursday of Module/Week 5. Part 3 – Replies (150 words each) Additionally, you will be required to post substantive written replies to at least 3 other students’ threads. Submit Discussion Board Forum 5 – Replies by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Sunday of Module/Week 6. • SECTION I: Dimensions of Management Culture Comparison Chart (refer to https://geerthofstede.com/culture-geert-hofstede-gert-jan-hofstede/6d-model-of-national-culture). Dimension Argentina Kuwait South Africa USA PDI 49 90 49 40 IDV 46 25 65 91 MAS 56 40 63 62 UAI 86 80 49 46 LTO 20 No Score 34 26 • SECTION 2: Analysis of Section I Results (500 words) In your own words, provide and answer to each of the following questions: 1. How do the dimensions of management culture of the 3 foreign nations differ from each other? . How do the dimensions of management culture of the 3 foreign nations differ from the USA?3. How are the dimensions of management culture of the 3 foreign nations similar to each other? 4. How are the dimensions of management culture of the 3 foreign nations similar to the USA?

View Related Questions

Solution Preview

Kuwait has a higher score in PDI in comparison with Argentina and South Africa meaning that a hierarchical order is already accepted by almost all citizens of Kuwait. Therefore, the level of inequality is high in Kuwait and the citizens are satisfied with it without questioning the level of inequality. In case of Individualism, Argentina’s citizens mostly take care of themselves alone, have some obligations towards their families, and calculative relations with employers. South Africa’s citizens are promoted in organizations mostly because of talent and there are contract-based relations with employers. The in-group dynamics is considered mostly for promoting employees in Kuwait as the citizens prefer to show loyalty towards their in-group members privately and professionally. There are more feminine characteristics shown by the citizens of Kuwait in managing conflicts with emotion and negotiation. There is more focus on surviving professionally and well-being of all individuals. South African citizens have scope of making mistakes by not adhering to legal rules and getting away with such non-compliance because of high level of tolerance and flexibility. LTO does not apply for the culture of Kuwait.